About Us

This book also frequently explains about the truth of the life-force. Actually, ‘life-force’ was first explained by the Indian vaidic-medical-philosophy (Ayurveda); and then more systematically explained by a subject of the “Organon of Medicine” in a German-medical-science (Homoeopathic-philosophy). {The word ‘Organon’ was derived from a Greek-element ‘Organum’, that means, “Literary-work” & it also means ”a method of the scientific-investigations”, which mainly teach that the physician should first theobiologically heal the patient to restore his life-force / vital-force, instead of showing his excellence in a technical-language only, i.e. also through a use of mostly a language of the life / language of nature. Before the German founder of Homoeopathic-medical-science Dr. Hahnemann (who wrote a great medical-philosophy or Theobiological-Philosophy, as “Organon of Medicine”); this word ‘Organon’ was first selected, by a famous Greek philosopher Aristotle; his various treatises on logic, were summed-up the common-title of ‘Organon’. Then came the famous British philosopher cum sociologist Lord Bacon, who also wrote a great book which was titled as “Novum Organum”, it means, “The New Literary-Work”. In short, here, a subject of ‘Organon’ is totally related with the matter of literary-works (rather than only a pure medical-works), i.e. as an intellectual-medicospiritual-works; so it can shed the light on a different aspects of ‘life’, on earth (biology) as well as ‘life’ beyond the terrestrial-orbit / space (exobiology).

Actually, in this cosmocellular-hypothesis, to explain widely about the Creator of universe, I have neutrally tried to explain about the different nature’s-phenomena, which daily take-place around us as well as within us, as in a different waves-forms of the energy. Hence, mostly, in every philosophy / science, it is commonly said that the God is the nature (energy) & nature is the God (energy). That’s why, also in ancient Indian Vaidic-science, it is frequently said like, “to try to understand the nature’s-phenomena, is to try to know the God’s-Mind (Cosmic-Mind)”. So, it will not be exaggerated to say that this book is for the nature’s-religion, rather than a book of any man-made-religion. (Indeed, for this book, it can be said as, “the life or cell-philosophy / the space-philosophy / medical-philosophy / quantum-philosophy / soul’s-philosophy, but it can not be a religious-philosophy”.) In short, in this book, it is neutrally tried to show or convey the straightway-message of the ancient vaidic-science (nature’s-science) to our today’s modern-science (machine’s-science).

Indeed, an ancient (vaidic)-science & modern-science both are explained the same things, but in a different ways & at the different times. Means, as the time went, only terminologies & styles of the story-tellings (or its proving-styles) are differed, but the truth is the same & one. Today, unfortunately, we modern-people mostly reject our great heritage of the vaidic-science, as a mythological or fabulous-stories only. No doubt, all the myths have not a scientific-approach, but it could be an explaining-styles of the different mysteries of the nature, that all the time, which can not be proved in our physical-lab. Indeed, vaidic-science (& its all branches) is (are) absolutely not a mythology; but it’s a natural-philosophy. For example, an ancient Indian-medicine (Ayurveda) is yet a practicing-evidence of the authentic medical-branch of vaidic-science, an ancient Indian-astronomy (Khagolshastra) is also a space-studying-branch of the vaidic-science. So, thus, its other vaidic-branches viz. meditation & yogic-sciences are also an authentic-branchs of the ancient vaidic-philosophy, and to them, the sky is the limit.

Actually, we wrongly say that the knowledge or science as an “ancient-science” & “modern-science”. Because, the science (knowledge or truth) neither represents as the ‘old’ nor as the ‘new’. But, it always remains as the same in every era of the human-being; (Like the energy is neither created nor destroyed, but it remains the same, only it changes its one form to another form). Means, where only terminologies & story-tellings or proving-styles of the observers / messengers are the different. Where all the old & new philosophical as well as scientific observers or messengers or faculties, are just like a different knowledge-conveying-media. Thus, knowledge neither becomes new nor old. On the contrary, we are the newer for every unknown-science (knowledge). In short, like the constant-space-time, the science (knowledge or truth) also remains constant & same. If it is changed; then it can not be a knowledge, but it is only our superficial or partly-fact-based information, which is daily changed from a person to person. Indeed, ancient (vaidic)-science & modern-science are complementary to each other. Modern-science may receive the so many research-helping-clues, from the ancienct or vaidic-science (that we have yet not been found out). So, all the time, we should not overlook it just as a mythological-concepts only.

Actually, ‘Veda’, means, the ‘knowledge’. And as a whole, ‘vaidic-science’ is mainly based on the collections of natural-experiences, art & knowledge, by a different natural-scientists (& in old-time, who called as ‘saints’ or ‘sages’ or ‘rushies’). They weared the saffron / white-coloured apron, like our today’s scientists wear the white or sky-blue coloured apron. Its saffron-colour is a symbolic-indication of the eternal ‘energy’ (fire).

Ancient Indian vaidic-science contains about more than a 38 different faculties of the natural-sciences, like Ayurveda (ancient-medicine), Khagolshastra (ancient-astronomy), Anvik-Vigyan (atomic-science), Jalshastra (hydrology), Jyotishshastra (astrology), Yoga-Vigyan or Yogic-science (mental & physical-health-science) etc.. For example, a volume of the original 'Bhrugusanhita' (which is a huge book of the astrology that shows mostly all details about the past, present & future-tenses of the person, grossly), that contains about 200 kg. weight. All four big volumes of Vedas (& their different Upnishads) of vaidic-science, contain about more than a 10,00,00 vaidic-rhymes or formulas. And most of them can yet explore the various mysteries of nature & universe, if they could be unprejudicely studied with a help of the modern-science’s-views. Here, my meaning to say is that such large collections of the ancient vaidic-science or any literature, can not be just a legend or myth only.

In short, in such a way, this book is prepared as a “science-complex”, i.e. on a base of different subjects of the ancient & modern sciences. So, through its systemic & hypothetical explanations (with a number of coloured-pictures), readers may realise a pleasure of (as the home-visit) of “science-city”. Actually, to all the old & new-sciences, it is impossible to make a unified-theory, to get the absolute-knowledge about the Creator. Because, before Him, our all the physical-laws or theories are broken-down. But, we may reach Him, through such Theoexobiological-approaches, i.e. through a unified cosmocellular-hypothesis or ‘Theobiophysics’.

For this book, I should also not use the term as a “unified-theory”. But, I should use the term ‘unified-hypothesis’. Because, ‘theory’ means, ‘proposition’, or a systematically generalisation which is supported by the absolutely controlled experiments which prove the doctrines. While, ‘hypothesis’, means, ‘supposition’, which is going to prove one’s rational logic or concept; or hypothesis is just reasoned-explanation of previous-ideas, through a rational-guess, which are incompleted still they could not prove their authenticities. No doubt, hypothesis is a one of the important steps of the actual-experiment to know the effects of that actual-experiment. Actually, still, there is no permanent physical-theory. Means, our all the physical-theories are provisional. Because, you can not say that in future, no one can contradict or challenge your theory.) Thus, in this book, many times, I have innocently & hypothetically tried to explain even the known nature’s-phenomena, to get a better knowledge about the Creator. After-all, a philosophical or hypothetical curiosity, is the basic nature of human-being.

Virtually, ‘meditation’ does not mean to sit with just closed-eyes, with a remembrance of one’s most believed-God only. But every positive & contemplative-work is known as the “(intellectual)-meditation”. For example: A search of the “law of gravitation”, was just because of a highly contemplative-mind of the great scientist Sir. Issac Newton. Before Newton, everyone knew that an everything is falling on earth. But about the same & known concept of the “falling of everything on earth”, he thought (meditated) differently (that was intellectually), worked differently & concluded differently. (If there had been someone else, he would have picked-up the apple, and ate it. What would I or you do?) Means, matter of the “falling of everything on earth”, is the same for all of us. Which is a very common, known & daily-phenomena of the nature. But Newton-like people are always thought differently about the every aspect / event of nature. Even a creation of the entire universe, is also occurred, because of, the great “Contemplative-Cosmic-Mind”. Actually, to try to explain or work differently about even any known matter or event, is also known as a “research-work”. (Hence, all the scientists / philosphers / artists etc. are not the creator; but they all are just as a founder of the whatever they have searched out; only God is the Creator of everything of universe.)

In short, mostly every time, an attempt of this book (from its very beginning to end), is to explain or relate everything of universe to meditation’s-phenomena; when & at the same time, it is discussed about any old or new event / matter of the universe or nature, that are as a “multidimensional-meditation-exercises”. And such multidimensionl-study of the nature of human-mind, body, his surroundings, universe & Creator of everything of universe etc., is known as a ‘Neurotheology’, and which is mostly based on such “scientific-biocosmic-meditation” or “intellectual-meditation”. And mostly which covers all the branches of science, along with a main subject of the philosophy or theology. So, later, which (Theophysics) can explain everything of universe (as a unified-hypothesis), on a general-aspects of the universe / nature.

Actually, in the science-field, religious-field & entire book-market, it is first-time happened by this hypothesis to prove the “existence of Creator of universe”, through a physical-laws (especially through the “Thermodynamics-Laws of Energy”). Of course, for this unified-hypothesis, I can not claim, but can surely say that now it has scientifically proved a very long-standing question of the “existence” of God or Super-Extraterrestrial-Intelligence (SETI).

In short, both volumes of this (fully A-4 sized) book are contained total 1600 pages, with a number of coloured-figures. But, at present, its first volume is to be going to publish in a book-market, by author’s self-publishing-company ‘Dhruv-Publication’. In a huge book-market, there are thousands of books, which are written on such chronic-concepts of the God, creation of universe, human mind-&-body, souls & Supreme-Soul (God), meditation & yoga etc. Then, to me, what is the need or justification to write this another book. Because, as per my knowledge, there would be a very rare books, which are scientifically written on the concepts of God & His creations (mainly cosmos & its very miniatured form the living-cells, as a microsized “living-cosmic-model”). Now, the youth of 21st century will not accept the myth / miracle-based-religion (or God) only. But he will also demand for a God-proving-religion or theory (like Neurotheology).

Actually, the God = G (Generator of universe) + O (Organiser of universe) + D (Destroyer of universe). Means, Creator of the universe is scientifically & cyclically behaves like the “First-Cause” as well as “Ultimate or Final-Cause” of the universe, with a respecting to all the nature’s-laws. Where He behaves as the scientific-God, but never as the religious-God. Where according to nature’s-law of the ‘triple-creations’ of universe (that are the subtle, astral & physical-universes), a systemic & scientific-organisation of their interspecific-relationship must also require. And it is never possible, without supercosmic-meditation of any supercosmic-mind (SETI). Hence, the God (SETI) Who also requires an intellectual or scientific-meditation (but not a religious-meditation), to generate out His highly frequencies containing cosmopsychostationary or cosmopsychopotential-waves from His very Contemplative-Cosmic-Mind to create the universe, to organise the universe & to destroy the universe. Where such His interspecific-relationship-based multidimensional-cosmic-meditation, is sequentially acted as a creative-meditation, organising-meditation & destructive-meditation. Where before the beginning or big-bang-blast of univesre, such His great intelligent cosmopsychostationary-waves could have acted, as a ‘First-Stimulus’ on the outer-surface of the highly zero-charged or very action-potential super-cosmic-atom (•) to blast & expand out it, in a great universe. Now, (along with an ancient vaidic-astronomy) our modern-science also believes that a whole physical-universe was / will be remained, in a very micro-sized but highly cosmopotential single-supercosmic-atom (•) before the beginning / end of the universe, respectively. In short, according to nature’s teleological-principle, where God always plays a (first-stimulus-giving) absolute-cosmic-stroke to highly zero-charged cosmic-energy to create the physical-univesre, but never plays dice. (Where, ‘Teleology’, means, certain or absolute-aim of the nature / Creator, behind the creation of every matter / event of universe).

In short, this book is not a neurotheological or cosmocellular-hypothesis only. But it is also a “Theoatomic-Hypothesis”. Because, all the (living-&-nonliving)-sciences-&-possibilities are involved in the atomic-theory. In this book, it is also philosophically as well as scientifically explained about the infinite-capacity of the infinitesimal-atom like: How our whole physical-universe was originated form the most tiny sized but highly cosmototipotential “Single-Supercosmic-Atom” (•)? From where, such (cosmototipotent-stem-cell-like) supercosmic-atoms (•) of universe could receive? And how this “single-supercosmic-atom” (•) can act as the “Supercosmic-Stem-Cell” to create the new universe, (like an embryonic totipotent-sem-cell can create the new living-orgnism)? And according to ancient-vaidic-principle of the ‘cosmobiogenesis’ (which explains the biogenetic-origin of universe), that how a new-universe or new solar-system or new earth (or its new ozone-layer) could also develop, by a cosmic-isolation (& then a cosmic-installation with a controlled-neuclear-fissioning of) the cosmototipotent-stem-cells” or “supercosmic-atoms” in the cosmoculture-medium / dish of the space-lab; {like a fully-matured living-being (or its any living-organs like liver, kidney, spleen, pancreas & bone-marrow etc.) can be devolped by an isolation & implantation of the embryonic-stem-cells in the cell-culture-medium / dish of the stem-science-lab}? Means, how was a “universe-recreation-technology” developed in ancient Indian-vaidic-era, (like the today’s “organ-regeneration-technology” has been developed by a modern-science)? In electrophysics, it is also explained like, “the smaller the physical-capacity of the matter / atom, the greater the potential-charged-energy of the matter / atom”. In short, an infinite-universe is involved in its infinitesimal cosmic-unit / seed i.e. the (supercosmic)-atom “•”, like a great tree is hidden in its smallest seed. In other words, it can be said about such great cosmic-contrariety like, “the greatest cosmic-infiniteness is involved in the smallest cosmic-infinitesimalness”. {In Indian mythology, ‘Shivmahapuran’, it is also explained that the Creator of universe the lord Shiva has about 10,000 names; and among them, He is also known as ‘Anu’ (atom). Here, that means, the great Creator of universe Who Himself, remains as in an infinitesimal-form of the “Supercosmic-Atom” (•).

Means, the atom in itself, is the great universe. In this way, Cosmic-Master-Mind or Super-Extraterrestrial- Intelligence (SETI) shows His great art from the tiny-sized (•) atom / cell to cosmos. Where Who has compacted the whole universe in the smallest one, i.e. in its cosmic-unit (•) the atom / cell. Thus, our whole universe is like a great “organic-unity”. Indeed, on earth, all the living-matters are covered by the nonliving-matters, and viceversa. For example, the viruses are considered as a connecting-link between, the living & nonliving-matters. According to such dual-biological-study; the viruses are as a nonliving-matter, because they can not carry out their own growth & division; on other hand, viruses are also as a living-matter, because they duplicate themselves, but which occurs in the living-cells of their host only. Where host’s living-cell-medium acts as a living-culture-medium, for the duplication of the viruses to create the new viruses.

Actually, according to ancient vaidic-principle of the cosmobiogenesis, in a whole universe, nothing is a nonliving-matter but everything is a living-matter; so, every atom of the universe is simultaneously contained the both the possibilities of biogenesisness-&-abiogenesisness: (like virus is belonged to both groups of the living & nonliving-matters. So, if virus can be cultured & multiplied, then why atoms can not be cultured & multiplied?) Because, matter can neither create the matter nor animate the matter, itself. As we know that an every matter contains a great internal-energy. Indeed, matter is nothing but it’s a highly condensed light / energy-particles (mostly positively-charged proton-particles). Hence, a whole universe (& its all the material as well as energy-particles) is belonged to infinitely dynamic or living-state. According to nature’s-dual-concepts (Dualism or Dwaitwad) of the “livingness-&-nonlivingness” of matter, that every nonliving-matter is externally behaved as a nonliving-thing, but its internal-dark-energy is behaved as a living-force or dynamic-force to generate out its different energy-waves. After-all, biologically, ‘life’ is nothing but it is just a dynamic-expression of the energy, at the different special-levels of ecosystem; and these all different special-levels of the dynamic-energy at the ecological-scale, are biologically known as the different ‘living-species / beings’ : (thus, ‘life’ is nothing but it’s just an expression of the energy-changes & exchanges of matter. Hence, every time, it is difficult to explain everything about the ‘life’ as in a pure terms of the physics & chemistry). In short, thus, our physical-body (& mostly its all living-cells) contain the all the possibilities-&-potentialities, within it / them.

That’s why, in ancient Indian-astronomy (Khagolshastra), it is frequently explained by its unified-cosmocellular-formula, i.e. as “Brahmande So Pinde, Pinde So Brahmande”; where ‘Brahmande’ means, in the universe, & ‘Pinde’, means, in the living-body / cells; that all mean as, “whatever is present or occurred in the space, which is also similarly present or occurred in the living-body / cells”. In modern biology, now, it is also believed that the living-cell is resemble the cosmic-egg (universe). With that, it also says that the ‘cytoplasm’ & ‘nucleus’ or ‘core’ of the living-cell, are similar to the ‘space-plasm’ & highly radioactive-core of the cosmic-egg, respectively. In words, ‘cytoplasm’ & ‘spaceplasm’, the ‘cyte’, means, the cell, & ‘plasm’, means, the formative-substance; while, its ‘nucleus’ or ‘core’, means, it’s a spheroid-body within the cell / atom, which contains the enormous-amount of the biological / nuclear / electromagnetic / radioactive-energy. In biology, it is also believed that the ‘cytoplasm’ is a physical-seat of the life-force in every living-cell. Thus, all the atoms of the stars, of the planets & of all of us, have the (hidden or latent)-life-force.

After-all, we all are the star-children; because, the atoms of me, the atoms of you & the atoms of all of us, are derived from the same star-elements which all have simultaneously contained the different opposite-like but balancing dual-characteristics / abilities of the particles-&-waves, matter-&-antimatter (energy), quarks-&-antiquarks, biogenesisness-&-abiogenesisness, creation-destruction-&-recreation, positive-&-negative-charges and male-&-female-forces etc.

Now, modern-science has also searched out the fossile-evidences of life (bacteria) on Mars-planet. So, in future, through such (any) unified-cosmocellular-view / principle; one day, we will surely reach the extra-terrestrial-life (ETL) or (a man-like or God-like) super-extraterrestrial-intelligence (SETI). No doubt, science (absolute-philosophy) always believes in its fact-finding physical-law, i.e. “to be seeing is to be believing”. But, with that, it (mainly exobiology) also rationally believes that, “all the time, an absence of the evidence, is not an evidence of the absence”. Because, unlike our five physical-senses (viz. vision, hearing, taste, touch & smell) and physical-lab, nothing is restricted / impossible to nature’s-lab. For example: ultrasound-waves are daily transmitted in the space / environment, but (without help of a physical-instruments), a human-auditory-system can not hear them by itself; or its visual-system can not see the ultraviolet-rays or infrared-waves by itself etc.. That’s why, after-all, a subject of the astronomy is also not a purely mathematical-science, that all the time which should follow our most restricted physical / mathematical-laws. Hence, its definition is explained like: Astronomy = Physics of the Space + Rational Philosophy.

This vaidic-unified-cosmocellular-formula of (Brahmnde So Pinde, Pinde So Brahmande) has astroanatomically linked-up the both subjects of astronomy & anatomy. Where it emphasizes that the astronomy is the mother of all sciences / all philosophies, that from which, first anatomy was developed, and then all the rest sciences / philosphies have gradually been developed. Because, when man became able to think in his most primitive-stage, he first looked upwards & then towards his body. So, in such a way, this book explains the chronological-events / matters, since an origin of universe, through a (reverse-like) microscopic-study ------> telescopic-study, or from cell (anatomy) ------> cosmos (astronomy). So, because of all these things, for a much better life of the human-being, if we can not ignore the human-science, then we can also not ignore the space-science. Virtually, now, a biological / medical-researches of the 21st-century will also be closely linked with the cosmological-researches; that means, in a unified-cosmocellular-discipline, i.e. as in the inquisitive-journey from cell ------> cosmos. Otherwise, a cell-science or medical-science (life-philosophy) will not progress in a true-sense, without simultaneously-progress of its mother-science the astronomy (the space-philosophy). That’s why, doctor should not renew his medical-knowledge only, but he should also retain the basic-concepts of the space-science / philosophy. Because, like a photosynthetic-phenomena which daily occurs between the solar-rays & plants-kingdoms, the cosmic-rays also daily act on our both the physical & mental-states. (For example, vitamin-D is a biocosmic-food, which is produced in our body, only due to influence of the ultraviolet-rays of the solar-light. In our body, it is produced, by the irradiation of the ergosterol with ultraviolet-rays of sunlight. And we know that vitamin-D is essential for the absorption of calcium & phosphorous from the intestines, for the formations of bones & teeth.) In short, a doctor who has such cosmocellular-knowledge, is called as an “astroanatomist” or “cosmocellulologist”. And, sometimes, such his astroanatomical-knowledge can be more helpful to space-research-lab, than a pure astronomer.

Actually, according to today’s-world of information-technology; thus, except such unified-hypothesis (which is scientifically based on a nature’s dual-concepts (i.e. a Dualism or Dwaitwad) of the “energy-&-matter” or “waves-&-particles”), there is also no any better way to explain even about the Creator of universe. In modern-physics (electrophysics), it is also said that an every event or matter of the universe (since its origin) can be explained, through a help of the dual-concepts containing Thermodynamics-laws of the “energy-&-matter” or “waves-&-particles”. And with that, where a computer-science is a better-medium to provide an excellent dual-platform, to such dual-theory of the “energy-&-matter” or “waves-&-particles”, later which absolutely goes towards the proving of God’s-existence. Actually, nature’s-duality (or nature’s double-standard) is prevailed, everywhere in universe. (For example, nowadays, here a software & hardware-programmes of computer-system can also be considered as a dual-parts of the “e-waves & material-particles”, respectively.)

(According to anthropology; actually, in a whole world, there is no religious-book which is directly written by the God, since human-evolution.) Indeed, no greater concept has been occupied a human-mind than the study of the Creator of universe, since his very primitive-stage. So, later, he could also become ready to accept that a ‘creation’ must have a ‘cause’; and without ‘Creator’, both the ‘cause’ & ‘creation’ are not possible, according to universal-law of the “Cause-&-Effect” (a theory of Karma). That’s why, to find out the “Final-Cause” of universe, first of all, it needs a strong “faith & reason-based invention”. Because, a reality-based faithful-mentality can always get the true-knowledge; while, a doubtful-mentality can be voided of the benefits of true-knowledge. In short, I am sure that this book will be definitely like to all groups of age, because of its certain research-making-clues. With all these things, a natural-story of this book (which contains the systemic-analysis of nature’s-events / phenomena), can also be useful for the unique documentary-film, on the Creator & its creations. In short, this book simultaneously challenges to our both the religious-belief & scientific-unbelief of the God. (And, at last, please, pardon me for such my long introductory-synopsis; because of, in which, you might have felt a confusion due to its different discrepancy-like topics. But, here which are just due to an attempt to show some essential-ideas of the book, through a few different parts of this science-complexity-containing huge-book. But, when you will read this whole book, you will not feel any discrepancy.)

My dear friend, if you want to read this book. Then you can get it, through any of the following purchasing-ways. I am waiting for your positive-response (i.e. through your little attempt to buy it from my self-publishing-unit ‘Dhruv-Publication’) to such my scientific-approach that goes to prove the entity of God. Because, I am sure that you will not unknown about the difficulties of new authors, in a publishing-market. Here with, I must also frankly say that I have many times tried to contact certain well-known national-&-international-publishers to publish my literary-works, before to start its self-publishing. Of course, most of them had heartly admired it, but with that they were also afraid to publish it. Because of, it is just written by an unfamous-author only. So, later, I have decided to publish it, as by its self-publication to reach you. And I am sure that (unlike all these well-known but prejudiced publishers) you will not disappoint & unjustify me, because of the same reason of as I am just a new-author or it’s my first book only. No doubt, for me, it is also true that I am a study-writer, not a professional-writer; and with that, English is my a second language. But to explain the nature’s-phenomena, every time, it is not required to become as expert one, professionally; but it mainly requires an intellectual-based natural-intuition-force to explore the mystery of nature. And when any naturally intuitional-force tries to come out, then it only represents in a simple & easy-language, never in a tough-language. Actually, it is very difficult to explain in the simple-language, than in a tough-language. Because, a tough-language is a language of the proffesional-brain; while, a simple-language is a language of the innocent-heart. And unlike tough-language, simple-language has very limited words-collections. So, it is very difficult to explain anything in a such limited words-collections.

In short, a (scientific / philosophical / grammatical)-suggestion of the every book-reader (from every religion / every nation / every science) about this hypothesis, will be acted as a mile-stone for me, during such our divine joint-journey, on a unified-cosmocellular-pathway that scientifically goes towards our most common & same finding of the Creator of universe. Thank you very much.

From,
Yours Sincerely,
Dr. Kamlesh N. Patel.
(Author).